Published by Vintage International in 2007 (one of many editions)
I got this book at the library.
This book is one you wanted to see reviewed in March and it completed my Around the World Book Challenge.
*THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS*
Synopsis via inside flap of the book:
From the Nobel Prize-winning author of One Hundred Years of Solitude comes a masterly evocation of an unrequited passion so strong that it binds three people's lives together for more than fifty years. In the story of Florentino Ariza, who waits more than half a century to declare his undying love to the beautiful Fermina Daza, whom he lost to Dr. Juvenal Urbino so many years before, García Márquez has created a vividly absorbing fictional world, as lush and dazzling as a dream and as real and immediate as our own deepest longings.
I was vastly underwhelmed by this one. In fact, I hated it. I'd read A Hundred Years of Solitude in the past and I really liked it so I was anticipating liking this one as well. I was not only disappointed, but I was, in a way almost offended.
The novel is supposed to be about many kinds of love, particularly unrequited love, but the character of Florentino is not one of my favorites. He sleeps with over 400 women, including his 14 year old ward when he is in his 60's. I'm sure there's an adjective for that and I'm guessing it's not "romantic".
Maybe it was a lack of reader comprehension, but my understanding is that part of the reason that Florentino and Fermina did not get married was because of a lack of maturity and some naivete on their parts as teenagers; as well as opposition from Fermina's father. Yet Fermina is able to move on and marry someone and has a moderately happy marriage. It's not perfect, nor is the man she marries, but you can sense that they did love each other during the years they were married.
This is what baffles me, Fermina married once and was able to move on with her life. Florentino slept with a staggering amount of women and claimed that each one of them was basically almost a suitable replacement for the women he lost, yet he's satisfied with none of them, so to speak. I'm pretty sure that's a mathematical impossibility. Even if you don't have viagrea. Plus, he prompts his 14 year old ward to commit suicide and is basically responsible for the murder of another woman (her jealous husband finds out about her infidelity because Florentina paints on her skin).
Plus, when Fermina's husband finally dies, Florentina doesn't even give her a proper amount of time to grieve, (the novel states that the scent of the flowers on his casket still permeated the house) and as in love with her as he claims, it's basically implied that due to their age their relationship was not what it could, or for that matter, should have been. ARE YOU KIDDING ME?? I stuck around for how many pages and the reunion isn't perfect? That's fucking crap.
The feminist part of me is so pissed off about this one. I'm a hopeless romantic. I love when two people cross distance and time and end up together in the end. But an oversexed old man who treats women like they are expendable objects doesn't make my heat go all a-flutter, (my stomach kind of was, but that's another issue entirely).
I know there are some people who LOVE this novel, Oprah claims that it's the greatest love story ever. (How I feel about Oprah and her book choices are also a separate issues). For those of you have read the novel, how did you feel about it?
I give the novel one dog-eared page.

Wow, you really hated this book! I didn't really think of it in a feministy, oh those poor women kind of way (although, now that you mention it...) I just genuinely didn't think it was that well written! I just kind of felt like I was missing something (ie the amazing bit) that everyone else seems to think is there- kind of like when I read The Catcher in the Rye...
ReplyDeleteI hated this book. DESPISED IT actually. As you, I was - and am still - BAFFLED why anyone in their right mind would love this book or claim it's ROMANTIC?!
ReplyDelete*sigh* Did I shout enough. Man alive, this book was awful. I couldn't get past the man *or* woman. And really....I don't get the title. I guess I was expecting something more along the lines of The Painted Veil.
Plus, sleeping with 400+ people?! Ew!
@Laura- I really hated this one, truly. I tried really hard to like it, or at least be able to write a civil response to it, but as you can see, that didn't really happen. I know what you mean about Catcher in the Rye though...
ReplyDelete@Christina- Yeah, I don't get the title either. I was kind of expecting something more along the line of Atonement, which I really did like. I'm glad that I'm not the only one that didn't like it.
Thanks for the comments ladies!
Dude, I love Atonement! And I don't even like Ian McEwan very much... Lol, how cool am I coming back to comment again?!
ReplyDelete